Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281818›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Evaluation of tracheal diameter and angles in fetuses with double aortic arch using prenatal ultrasound: implications for postnatal management.

Caihong Jiang, Wen Ling, Longzhuang Peng, Shan Guo, Qiumei Wu, Chunxia Chen, Fa Chen, He Li, Zongjie Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caihong Jiang *Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Wen Ling *Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Longzhuang Peng *Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Shan GuoDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Qiumei WuDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Chunxia ChenDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Fa ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
He LiDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Zongjie WengDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the value of prenatal ultrasound in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of double aortic arch (DAA) malformations. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 fetal cases with double aortic arch anomalies over a 12-year period from June 1, 2011 to June 1, 2023. The assessment included combined measurements of fetal tracheal internal diameter Z-score and DAA pinch angle, along with ultrasonographic findings, associated anomalies, genetic abnormalities, postnatal CTA images, and long-term postnatal outcomes. Results: Of the 31 fetal double aortic arch cases, 15 were right aortic arch dominant, 2 were left aortic arch dominant, and 14 had a balanced double arch. Genetic testing was performed on 19 cases, revealing abnormalities in 2 cases, including one Turner syndrome, and one carrier of ichthyosis gene with heterozygous deletion. Out of the total cases, 29 were delivered, and 2 cases were terminated. Prenatal diagnosis accurately identified 29 cases (29/31, 93.5%), which was confirmed by postnatal pathological anatomy, echocardiography, surgery or CTA. Fetal tracheal internal diameter Z-scores were significantly smaller in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (-1.27 ± 0.49 vs -0.68 ± 0.60, Conclusion: Prenatal echocardiography demonstrates good diagnostic efficacy for fetal double aortic arch. It is also essential to detect the presence of other underlying intra- and extracardiac malformations and genetic abnormalities. There is a significant difference in prenatal tracheal internal diameter Z-scores and double arch pinch angle between asymptomatic and symptomatic DAA infants. Symptomatic infants require early surgery, while asymptomatic infants should be monitored.

Indexed as

double aortic archechocardiographyfetuspostnatal analysisprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39281818
PMCPMC11392772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.