ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Gingival margin stabilization using the final prosthetic restoration (BOPT). A case report.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of provisional crown and bridge materials fabricated using milling, three-dimensional printing and conventional methods: An in vitro study.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2026Article
- Influence of Marginal Tooth Preparation Designs on Periodontal Health and Long-Term Stability: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most contentious and extensively discussed topics in the field of dentistry when fabricating prosthetic restorations is the location and design of the finishing line in relation to the gingival tissues. Upon completion of the temporary crown and subsequent fabrication of the final restoration, two potential issues may arise: 1) the analog or digital impression may not accurately reflect the shape of the gingiva obtained with the temporary crown due to gingival collapse upon crown removal, even in the presence of retraction cords; and 2) the desired gingival shape may not have been achieved with the temporary crown. The objective of this article is to describe the stabilization of gingival tissues following twelve weeks of clinical observation. During this period, the provisional crown is recontoured twice in the apical-coronal direction with a four-week interval. This approach allows for the growth of sufficient gingival tissue in the horizontal direction at the point of the vestibular emergence profile, which will then stabilize once more following a slight recontouring of the final restoration, which will be performed in the clinic. The amount of gingival adaptation is not quantifiable in a numerical sense; rather, it is directly proportional to the amount of tissue that can be obtained with the new emergence profile of the temporary crown. The outcome is contingent upon the operator and there is no fixed quantity that can be achieved in every instance. In essence, there is no fixed numerical value that can be relied upon to lower the gingival parabola in the apical-coronal direction through the adaptation of tissues to the new shape of the temporary crown emergence profile.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.