Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281737›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

A Common Longitudinal Intensive Care Unit data Format (CLIF) to enable multi-institutional federated critical illness research.

Juan C Rojas, Patrick G Lyons, Kaveri Chhikara, Vaishvik Chaudhari, Sivasubramanium V Bhavani, Muna Nour, Kevin G Buell, Kevin D Smith, Catherine A Gao, Saki Amagai and 14 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Juan C RojasDivision of Pulmonology, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL.
Patrick G LyonsDepartment of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Kaveri ChhikaraSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Vaishvik ChaudhariDivision of Pulmonology, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL.
Sivasubramanium V BhavaniDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Muna NourDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Kevin G BuellSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Kevin D SmithSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Catherine A GaoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Saki AmagaiDivision of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Chengsheng MaoDivision of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Yuan LuoDivision of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Anna K BarkerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Mark NuppnauDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Haley BeckMacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Rachel BaccileSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Michael HermsenDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Zewei LiaoDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Brenna Park-EganDepartment of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Kyle A CareyDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
XuanHanDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Chad H HochbergDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Nicholas E IngrahamDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
William F ParkerSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-6000-3153

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN RESPIRATORY BIOLOGYT32HL007605 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Yun Fang, Gokhan M. Mutlu · 1985 to 2026
$18.1M
CRITICAL: Collaborative Resource for Intensive care Translational science, Informatics, Comprehensive Analytics, and LearningU01TR003528 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CIMINO, JAMES J, LUO, YUAN · 2021 to 2024
$4.9M
Data Driven Strategies for Substance Misuse Identification in Hospitalized PatientsR01DA051464 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Majid Afshar · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
Improving the efficiency and equity of critical care allocation during a crisis with place-based disadvantage indicesR01LM014263 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI William F Parker · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
Modeling the Incompleteness and Biases of Health DataR01LM013337 · NLM · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LUO, YUAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
Identification of Precision Sepsis Subphenotypes Using Vital Sign TrajectoriesK23GM144867 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BHAVANI, SIVASUBRAMANIUM · 2021 to 2025
$890k
SPOT-IT: Sepsis Prediction in Oncology Through Implementation Science and TechnologyK08CA270383 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Patrick G Lyons · 2024 to 2026
$851k
Sustainable Implementation of Prone Positioning for the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeK23HL169743 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Chad Hochberg · 2023 to 2026
$716k
Mending a Broken Heart Allocation System with Machine LearningK08HL150291 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PARKER, WILLIAM F · 2020 to 2024
$713k
Identifying Areas to Improve ICU Outcomes through Provider VariationK23HL166783 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Nicholas E Ingraham · 2023 to 2026
$645k
Machine learning to predict cure in severe pneumonia episodesK23HL169815 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Catherine A. Gao · 2024 to 2026
$501k
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR003528NCI NIH HHS K08 CA270383NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL150291NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL166783NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL169743NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL169815NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007605NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051464NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM144867NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013337NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Critical illness, or acute organ failure requiring life support, threatens over five million American lives annually. Electronic health record (EHR) data are a source of granular information that could generate crucial insights into the nature and optimal treatment of critical illness. However, data management, security, and standardization are barriers to large-scale critical illness EHR studies. Methods: A consortium of critical care physicians and data scientists from eight US healthcare systems developed the Common Longitudinal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) data Format (CLIF), an open-source database format that harmonizes a minimum set of ICU Data Elements for use in critical illness research. We created a pipeline to process adult ICU EHR data at each site. After development and iteration, we conducted two proof-of-concept studies with a federated research architecture: 1) an external validation of an in-hospital mortality prediction model for critically ill patients and 2) an assessment of 72-hour temperature trajectories and their association with mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality using group-based trajectory models. Results: We converted longitudinal data from 94,356 critically ill patients treated in 2020-2021 (mean age 60.6 years [standard deviation 17.2], 30% Black, 7% Hispanic, 45% female) across 8 health systems and 33 hospitals into the CLIF format, The in-hospital mortality prediction model performed well in the health system where it was derived (0.81 AUC, 0.06 Brier score). Performance across CLIF consortium sites varied (AUCs: 0.74-0.83, Brier scores: 0.06-0.01), and demonstrated some degradation in predictive capability. Temperature trajectories were similar across health systems. Hypothermic and hyperthermic-slow-resolver patients consistently had the highest mortality. Conclusions: CLIF facilitates efficient, rigorous, and reproducible critical care research. Our federated case studies showcase CLIF's potential for disease sub-phenotyping and clinical decision-support evaluation. Future applications include pragmatic EHR-based trials, target trial emulations, foundational multi-modal AI models of critical illness, and real-time critical care quality dashboards.

Indexed as

Critical Care DataMachine LearningTemperature Trajectory Modeling

Identifiers

PMID39281737
PMCPMC11398431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.