ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
Improved localization and segmentation of spinal bone metastases in MRI with nnUNet radiomics.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic wavelet transform normalized multi scale dense attention UNet with Binary Horse Herd Optimization for osteosarcoma diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Applications and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Metastasis Imaging: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Revolutionising osseous biopsy: the impact of artificial intelligence in the era of personalized medicine.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Variability exists in the subjective delineation of tumor areas in MRI scans of patients with spinal bone metastases. This research aims to investigate the efficacy of the nnUNet radiomics model for automatic segmentation and identification of spinal bone metastases. Methods: A cohort of 118 patients diagnosed with spinal bone metastases at our institution between January 2020 and December 2023 was enrolled. They were randomly divided into a training set (n = 78) and a test set (n = 40). The nnUNet radiomics segmentation model was developed, employing manual delineations of tumor areas by physicians as the reference standard. Both methods were utilized to compute tumor area measurements, and the segmentation performance and consistency of the nnUNet model were assessed. Results: The nnUNet model demonstrated effective localization and segmentation of metastases, including smaller lesions. The Dice coefficients for the training and test sets were 0.926 and 0.824, respectively. Within the test set, the Dice coefficients for lumbar and thoracic vertebrae were 0.838 and 0.785, respectively. Strong linear correlation was observed between the nnUNet model segmentation and physician-delineated tumor areas in 40 patients ( Conclusions: The nnUNet model exhibits efficacy in automatically localizing and segmenting spinal bone metastases in MRI scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.