Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281629›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

TopicTracker - An advanced software pipeline for text mining on PubMed data: Bridging the gap between off-the-shelf tools and code based approaches.

Giovanni Spitale, Federico Germani, Nikola Biller-Andorno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giovanni SpitaleInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Federico GermaniInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nikola Biller-AndornoInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The ever-increasing volume of academic literature necessitates efficient and sophisticated tools for researchers to analyze, interpret, and uncover trends. Traditional search methods, while valuable, often fail to capture the nuance and interconnectedness of vast research domains. Results: TopicTracker, a novel software tool, addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive solution from querying PubMed databases to creating intricate semantic network maps. Through its functionalities, users can systematically search for desired literature, analyze trends, and visually represent co-occurrences in a given field. Our case studies, including support for the WHO on ethical considerations in infodemic management and mapping the evolution of ethics pre- and post-pandemic, underscore the tool's applicability and precision. Conclusions: TopicTracker represents a significant advancement in academic research tools for text mining. While it has its limitations, primarily tied to its alignment with PubMed, its benefits far outweigh the constraints. As the landscape of research continues to expand, tools like TopicTracker may be instrumental in guiding scholars in their pursuit of knowledge, ensuring they navigate the large amount of literature with clarity and precision.

Indexed as

Automated literature reviewCustomizable text miningOpen-source text analysisPubMed data analysisReproducible workflowScientific literature processingText mining pipeline

Identifiers

PMID39281629
PMCPMC11399583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.