ArticleHeliyon2024
Construction of a NETosis-related gene signature for predicting the prognostic status of sepsis patients.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Reveal Myricanone's Role in Alleviating Ischemic Cerebral Infarction via Targeting MAPK14.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- EGFR orchestrates neutrophil activation and NETosis via CEBPβ-dependent PGLYRP1 induction.Cell death and differentiation · 2026Article
- Neutrophil in sepsis: functional aberration and regulated cell death.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a common traumatic complication of response disorder of the body to infection. Some studies have found that NETosis may be associated with the progression of sepsis. Methods: Data of the sepsis samples were acquired from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Gene set enrichment score was calculated using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks analysis, and stepwise multivariable regression analysis were performed to identify NETosis-associated genes for sepsis prognosis. To assess the infiltration of immune cells, the ESTIMATE and CIBERPSORT algorithms were used. Functional enrichment analysis was conducted in the clusterProfiler package. Results: Different programmed death pathways were abnormally activated in sepsis patients as compared to normal samples. We screened five important NETosis associated genes, namely, CEACAM8, PGLYRP1, MAPK14, S100A12, and LCN2. These genes were significantly positively correlated with entotic cell death and ferroptosis and negatively correlated with autophagy. A clinical prognostic model based on riskscore was established using the five genes. The ROC curves of the model at 7 days, 14 days and 21 days all had high AUC values, indicating a strong stability of the model. Patients with high riskscore had lower survival rate than those with low riskscore. After the development of a nomogram, calibration curve and decision curve evaluation also showed a strong prediction performance and reliability of the model. As for clinicopathological features, older patients and female patients had a relatively high riskscore. The riskscore was significantly positively correlated with cell cycle-related pathways and significantly negatively correlated with inflammatory pathways. Conclusion: We screened five NETosis-associated genes that affected sepsis prognosis, and then established a riskscore model that can accurately evaluate the prognosis and survival for sepsis patients. Our research may be helpful for the diagnosis and clinical treatment of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.