ArticleHeliyon2024
Predicting all-cause mortality and premature death using interpretable machine learning among a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Clinical and Minimally Invasive Readouts Enable Early Assessment of Disease Trajectory in Preclinical Infection Models.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of premature death from multimorbidity among people with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop machine learning-based prediction models for all-cause and premature mortality among the middle-aged and elderly population in China. Method: Adults aged 45 years or older at baseline of 2011 from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were included. The stacked ensemble model was built utilizing five selected machine learning algorithms. These models underwent training and testing using the CHARLS 2011-2015 cohort (derivation cohort) and subsequently underwent external validation using the CHARLS 2015-2018 cohort (validation cohort). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was introduced to quantify the importance of risk factors and explain machine learning algorithms. Result: In derivation cohort, a total of 10,677 subjects were included, 478 died during the follow-up. The stacked ensemble model demonstrated the highest efficacy in terms of its discrimination capability for predicting all-cause mortality and premature death, with an AUC[95 % CI] of 0.826[0.792-0.859] and 0.773[0.725-0.821], respectively. In validation cohort, the corresponding AUC[95 % CI] were 0.803[0.743-0.864] and 0.791[0.719-0.863], respectively. Risk factors including age, sex, self-reported health, activities of daily living, cognitive function, ever smoker, levels of systolic blood pressure, Cystatin C and low density lipoprotein were strong predictors for both all-cause mortality and premature death. Conclusion: Stacked ensemble models performed well in predicting all-cause and premature death in this Chinese cohort. Interpretable techniques can aid in identifying significant risk factors and non-linear relationships between predictors and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.