ArticleHeliyon2024
Multivariable model for gait pattern differentiation in elderly patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis: A wearable sensor approach.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning of wrist accelerometry from UK Biobank data identifies early movement signatures of knee osteoarthritis up to 5 years before diagnosis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Monitoring Gait Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Wearable Sensors: Responsiveness of Gait Accelerations.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients demonstrate distinct gait patterns, yet detecting subtle abnormalities with wearable sensors remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess a predictive model's efficacy in distinguishing between hip and knee OA gait patterns using accelerometer data. Method: Participants with hip or knee OA underwent overground walking assessments, recording lower limb accelerations for subsequent time and frequency domain analyses. Logistic regression with regularization identified associations between frequency domain features of acceleration signals and OA, and k-nearest neighbor classification distinguished knee and hip OA based on selected acceleration signal features. Findings: We included 57 knee OA patients (30 females, median age 68 [range 49-89], median BMI 29.7 [range 21.0-45.9]) and 42 hip OA patients (19 females, median age 70 [range 47-89], median BMI 28.3 [range 20.4-37.2]). No significant difference could be found in the time domain's averaged shape of acceleration signals. However, in the frequency domain, five selected features showed a diagnostic ability to differentiate between knee and hip OA. Using these features, a model achieved a 77 % accuracy in classifying gait cycles into hip or knee OA groups, with average precision, recall, and F1 score of 77 %, 76 %, and 78 %, respectively. Interpretation: The study demonstrates the effectiveness of wearable sensors in differentiating gait patterns between individuals with hip and knee OA, specifically in the frequency domain. The results highlights the promising potential of wearable sensors and advanced signal processing techniques for objective assessment of OA in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.