Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281497›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Multivariable model for gait pattern differentiation in elderly patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis: A wearable sensor approach.

Arash Ghaffari, Pernille Damborg Clasen, Rikke Vindberg Boel, Andreas Kappel, Thomas Jakobsen, John Rasmussen, Søren Kold, Ole Rahbek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Monitoring Gait Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Wearable Sensors: Responsiveness of Gait Accelerations.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arash GhaffariInterdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pernille Damborg ClasenInterdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Rikke Vindberg BoelInterdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Andreas KappelInterdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Thomas JakobsenInterdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
John RasmussenDepartment of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Søren KoldInterdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ole RahbekInterdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients demonstrate distinct gait patterns, yet detecting subtle abnormalities with wearable sensors remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess a predictive model's efficacy in distinguishing between hip and knee OA gait patterns using accelerometer data. Method: Participants with hip or knee OA underwent overground walking assessments, recording lower limb accelerations for subsequent time and frequency domain analyses. Logistic regression with regularization identified associations between frequency domain features of acceleration signals and OA, and k-nearest neighbor classification distinguished knee and hip OA based on selected acceleration signal features. Findings: We included 57 knee OA patients (30 females, median age 68 [range 49-89], median BMI 29.7 [range 21.0-45.9]) and 42 hip OA patients (19 females, median age 70 [range 47-89], median BMI 28.3 [range 20.4-37.2]). No significant difference could be found in the time domain's averaged shape of acceleration signals. However, in the frequency domain, five selected features showed a diagnostic ability to differentiate between knee and hip OA. Using these features, a model achieved a 77 % accuracy in classifying gait cycles into hip or knee OA groups, with average precision, recall, and F1 score of 77 %, 76 %, and 78 %, respectively. Interpretation: The study demonstrates the effectiveness of wearable sensors in differentiating gait patterns between individuals with hip and knee OA, specifically in the frequency domain. The results highlights the promising potential of wearable sensors and advanced signal processing techniques for objective assessment of OA in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Gait analysisHip osteoarthritisInertial measurement unitKnee osteoarthritisWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID39281497
PMCPMC11395743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.