ArticleHeliyon2024
Prediction of future dementia among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by integrating multimodal clinical data.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond single-modality screening: toward an EEG-IoT dual-stream framework for early detection of mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning for precision prevention of cognitive decline: integrating multimodal biomarkers, lifestyle interventions, and natural medicines from prediction to clinical practice.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Artificial neural networks fighting real neural decline: a systematic review of AI in Alzheimer's research.Artificial intelligence review · 2026Article
- Research progress of multimodal biomarkers in the early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficiently and objectively analyzing the complex, diverse multimodal data collected from patients at risk for dementia can be difficult in the clinical setting, contributing to high rates of underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis of this serious disorder. Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are especially at risk of developing dementia in the future. This study evaluated the ability of multi-modal machine learning (ML) methods, especially the Ensemble Integration (EI) framework, to predict future dementia development among patients with MCI. EI is a machine learning framework designed to leverage complementarity and consensus in multimodal data, which may not be adequately captured by methods used by prior dementia-related prediction studies. We tested EI's ability to predict future dementia development among MCI patients using multimodal clinical and imaging data, such as neuroanatomical measurements from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, from The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction of Longitudinal Evolution (TADPOLE) challenge. For predicting future dementia development among MCI patients, on a held out test set, the EI-based model performed better (AUC = 0.81, F-measure = 0.68) than the more commonly used XGBoost (AUC = 0.68, F-measure = 0.57) and deep learning (AUC = 0.79, F-measure = 0.61) approaches. This EI-based model also suggested MRI-derived volumes of regions in the middle temporal gyrus, posterior cingulate gyrus and inferior lateral ventricle brain regions to be predictive of progression to dementia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.