Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281406›Full record

ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology

Adverse Events of Femtosecond-Assisted Laser-Assisted

Sungmin Hong, Austin Yu, Amanda Wong, Richard Adamovich-Zeitlin, Paras Shah, Josue Minaya, Carol Wang, Travis Peng, Matthew Saleem, Nathan Lau and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sungmin HongDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Austin YuDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Amanda WongDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Richard Adamovich-ZeitlinDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Paras ShahManhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Josue MinayaDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Carol WangDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Travis PengDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Matthew SaleemDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Nathan LauNorthwell Health Eye Institute, Great Neck, New York, USA.
Rohun GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Matthew GorskiManhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Jules WinokurManhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Daniel ZhuManhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the United States Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, which contains reports of adverse events involving medical devices, and characterize the most common adverse events of femtosecond (FS) laser-assisted Methods: The MAUDE database was queried on May 19, 2022, for adverse events involving the ophthalmic FS laser reported from January 2012 to April 2022. Reports unrelated to LASIK procedures were excluded. Data extraction was performed on these reports, including the type of adverse event and whether surgery was successfully completed. Frequency analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: From the 3491 reported adverse events involving the FS laser system, 1136 met the inclusion criteria. Of the 672 cases where outcomes were reported, 476 were successfully completed and 196 were aborted. The most common intraoperative complications were incomplete cut (42.8%), thinner than intended flap (17.6%), and difficulty lifting the flap (12.0%). FS-related complications included opaque bubble layer (2.3%), air bubbles in the anterior chamber (2.4%), and vertical gas breakthrough (4.1%). Other device-related intraoperative complications included suction loss (10.2%), difficulty docking (2.4%), and laser malfunction (2.0%). The most common postoperative complications were diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) (7.8%) and rainbow glare (4.6%). Conclusion: The most common intraoperative FS-assisted LASIK complication in the MAUDE database was an incomplete flap. The most common postoperative complication was DLK. This study is the first to investigate FS-assisted LASIK adverse events in the MAUDE database. It can raise awareness of real-world surgical complications and help ophthalmologists better counsel and treat patients.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsComplicationsLaser-assisted in situ keratomileusisOphthalmologyRefractive surgeryUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID39281406
PMCPMC11392306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.