ReviewJournal of current ophthalmology
Physical Characteristics, Clinical Application, and Side Effects of Viscoelastics in Ophthalmology.
Review in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel TA-IVIZ Patch and BSS Tamponade for Macular Hole Repair: A Pilot Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Surgical Technique: Viscodissection for Managing Funnel Retinal Detachments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explain the physical properties of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs), covering their structural units, optimal features, existing viscoelastic materials, clinical applications, and potential side effects. Methods: This is a narrative review on the OVDs. A literature review was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. Studies that investigated physical characteristics, clinical applications, OVD commercial products, and their complications were included. Results: We included 42 articles from 2010 and discussed physical characteristics, properties of a desirable OVD, structural units of common OVDs, OVD commercial products, clinical applications, and also complications of OVDs. Conclusions: Today, viscoelastics hold a distinct and crucial role in intraocular surgery due to their remarkable properties. These materials safeguard the endothelium and epithelium, uphold anterior chamber depth, manage intraocular bleeding, ease tissue handling, and aid intraocular lens placement. Currently, the American market features 12 prevalent viscoelastic types, including 7 sodium hyaluronate derivatives (Healon, Healon-Greater Viscosity, Healon-5, Amvisc, Amvisc Plus, Advanced Medical Optics Vitrax, and Provisc), 2 hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 2% derivatives (OcuCoat and Cellugel), and 3 combinations of sodium hyaluronate and chondroitin sulfate (Viscoat, DisCoVisc, and DuoVisc). Despite the introduction of new viscoelastic materials annually, no single material encompasses all desired properties. Surgeons must select and employ suitable viscoelastics based on surgical conditions and patient requirements. Advancements in material development and understanding of physical properties and clinical applications continue to refine viscoelastic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.