ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Clinical Profile of Patients with Hemifacial Spasm at a Tertiary Eye Care Center in South India: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the incidence and clinical profile of hemifacial spasm (HFS) and the association between HFS and systemic diseases. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out on 85 patients with HFS, presenting at a tertiary eye care center in South India. Demographic and clinical details were recorded for all patients. Of these, the patients who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain were analyzed for primary and secondary HFS. Results: The mean age of the patients was 56.11 ± 12.51 years. The age at onset of HFS was 54.9 ± 12.7 years. The disease duration was 9.51 ± 7.28 years. Male:female ratio was 1:1.17. The right side was involved in 31 patients (36.47%) and the left side in 54 patients (63.52%). MRI was performed in 54 (63.52%) patients and showed neurovascular conflict in 22 (40.74%) patients and space-occupying lesions in 2 (3.70%) patients. Forty-nine (57.64%) patients had primary HFS, while five (5.88%) patients had secondary HFS due to old facial palsy in 3 and space-occupying lesions in two patients. Twenty (23.52%) patients received botulinum toxin A with a good response. Type of HFS had a significant association with hypertension ( Conclusions: Primary HFS was the main type of HFS with female dominance and predilection for the left side. Hypertension had a relationship with HFS that needs to be investigated further for its causal nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.