Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281327›Full record

ArticleResearch in human development2024

A Lifecourse Perspective on Singlehood.

Justin Jager, Amy Rauer, Gregory S Pettit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in human development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin JagerT. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Amy RauerDepartment of Child and Family Studies, University of Tennessee at Knoxville.
Gregory S PettitDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, Auburn University.

Funding

Age, period, and cohort effects on gender differences in alcohol use and alcohol use disorders in 47 national, longitudinally-followed cohortsR01AA026861 · NIAAA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JAGER, JUSTIN O, KEYES, KATHERINE M. · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of adults are spending more of their lifetime as single, either because they are taking longer to form unions, are re-entering singlehood after the dissolution of unions, or are avoiding union formation all together. Nevertheless, existing relationship research still generally positions singlehood as something to avoid, limiting our understanding of the rapidly evolving position of singlehood within the lifecourse as well as its implications for health and well-being. Thus, this special issue includes four articles that collectively offer theoretical and empirical inquiries of developmental and historical trends in singlehood and relationship histories, examine the antecedents and consequences of these trends, and explore how they vary based on salient sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, this special issue demonstrates that singlehood is more than just a temporary status within one's "progression" to the formation of committed relationships. It is our hope that the papers in this issue will encourage scholars to revise and expand their perspective on relationships to include singlehood alongside committed relationships as a potentially viable and healthy status as well as valid point of destination.

Indexed as

LifecourseSinglehoodUnion Formation

Identifiers

PMID39281327
PMCPMC11391892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.