ArticleGastroenterology report2024
Hiatal hernia: risk factors, and clinical and endoscopic aspects in gastroscopy.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidental esophageal and gastroesophageal junction uptake on ¹Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of real-time dynamic gastric contrast ultrasound for hiatal hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of hiatus hernia on Barrett's oesophagus: a scoping review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hiatal hernia (HH) is a common finding in gastroscopy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency rate of HH among patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) according to their age, gender, and procedural indication. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study including all EGDs was conducted across seven endoscopy departments between 2016 and 2021. Demographic information, procedural indications, and findings from the initial EGD were collected. Results: Of the 162,608 EGDs examined, 96,369 (59.3%) involved female patients. HH was identified in 39,619 (24.4%) of all EGDs performed, comprising small HH in 31,562 (79.6%) and large HH in 3,547 (9.0%). The frequency of HH was 16.5% in the age group of ≤50 years and 37.3% in those aged ≥81 years. HH was diagnosed in 38.7% (11,370) of patients with heartburn/reflux symptoms, 31.5% of those with dysphagia, 28.5% of those with positive fecal occult blood tests, and 24.3% of those who would undergo bariatric surgery. Age (odds ratio 1.030), female gender (odds ratio 1.309), reflux symptoms (odds ratio 2.314), and dysphagia (odds ratio 1.470) were identified as predictors for HH. Conclusions: Risk factors for HH diagnosed by EGD in symptomatic patients were shown to be advanced age, female gender, and the presence of heartburn or dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.