ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024
Factors associated with adherence to swallowing therapy among patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Video game-based interventions for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Dysphagia Care Access, Utilization, and Quality in the United States: A Scoping Review.Dysphagia · 2026Article
- Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Parkinson's Disease: An Analysis of Prevalence, Swallow Therapy Utilization, and Complication Rates.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Article
- Factors associated with adherence to swallowing therapy among patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess disparities in adherence to swallowing therapy for clinically diagnosed oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) patients. Methods: Analysis was conducted on data from 600 patients with OD and confirmed impairments in swallowing safety and/or efficiency on a videofluoroscopic swallow study. Patients were classified based on their adherence to treatment sessions, defined as the number of swallow treatment sessions attended. The outcome of treatment adherence was categorized into two groups: those who attended fewer than 50% of the prescribed treatment sessions and those who attended 50% or more of the sessions. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median ± interquartile range. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square tests and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models were employed to identify factors associated with successful adherence. Results: Approximately 79% adhered to swallowing treatment. We found no significant relationship between adherence and age, sex, race, ethnicity, primary language, marital status, insurance status, occupation, median income, distance, education, OD severity, and diagnosis year ( Conclusion: The variables analyzed in this study were not significantly associated with nonadherence to swallow therapy. Nevertheless, our study still addressed an important knowledge gap and future studies would benefit from exploring other relevant socioeconomic and disease-related factors. Level of evidence: Level 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.