ArticlePalliative medicine reports2024
Feasibility and Safety of Food Containing
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prophylactic effects ofBiomedical reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a major obstacle to quality of life. Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of ASH in patients with CRF. Methods: Fifteen patients with CRF consumed ASH drink for 28 days. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of the study, and the secondary endpoints were changes in brief fatigue inventory (BFI), oxidative stress markers, and adverse events. Results: Seven patients successfully completed the study. Four patients who had BFI <5.5 at enrollment revealed a decrease in BFI. The biological antioxidant potential/diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites ratio, potential antioxidant capacity, was increased but not significant ( Conclusions: Approximately 50% patients were successful in consuming ASH for 28 days. Patients with mild CRF showed improvement by using ASH. However, further investigations are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.