Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281168›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Multidimensional quantitative characterization of periocular morphology: distinguishing esotropia from epicanthus by deep learning network.

Huimin Li, Shengqiang Shi, Lixia Lou, Jing Cao, Ziying Zhou, Xingru Huang, Juan Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huimin Li *Eye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
Shengqiang Shi *School of Communication Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Lixia Lou *Eye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
Jing CaoEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
Ziying ZhouEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
Xingru HuangSchool of Communication Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Juan YeEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prominent epicanthus could not only diminish the eyes' aesthetics but may be deceptive for its typical appearance of pseudo-esotropia. This study aims to apply a deep learning model to characterize the periocular morphology for preliminary identification. Methods: This prospective study consecutively included 300 subjects visiting the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital. Children aged 7-18 years with simple epicanthus or concomitant esotropia and healthy volunteers who were age- and gender-matched were eligible for inclusion. Multiple metrics were extracted automatically and manually from facial images to characterize the periocular morphology and binocular symmetry. The dice coefficient (Dice), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman biases were calculated to evaluate their consistency. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined the cut-off values of symmetry indexes (SIs) for distinguishing concomitant esotropia subjects from epicanthus ones. Results: The Dice for eyelid and cornea segmentation were 0.949 and 0.944, respectively. The ICCs of the two measurements ranged from 0.898 to 0.983. Biases ranged from 0.16 to 0.74 mm. The periocular morphology of epicanthus eyes was significantly different from the normal ones, including palpebral fissure width (21.41±1.53 Conclusions: Our study established a standard deep learning system for characterizing the periocular morphology of epicanthus and esotropia eyes with great accuracy. This objective method could be generalized to other periocular morphological assessments for clinical care.

Indexed as

automated image analysisdeep learningepicanthusPeriocular morphological features

Identifiers

PMID39281168
PMCPMC11400697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.