Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281155›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

A brain structure learning-guided multi-view graph representation learning for brain network analysis.

Tao Wang, Zenghui Ding, Xianjun Yang, Yanyan Chen, Changhua Lu, Yining Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao WangHefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-3977
Zenghui DingHefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.
Xianjun YangHefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.
Yanyan ChenHefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.
Changhua LuSchool of Computer and Information, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Yining SunHefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Resting-state brain networks represent the interconnectivity of different brain regions during rest. Utilizing brain network analysis methods to model these networks can enhance our understanding of how different brain regions collaborate and communicate without explicit external stimuli. However, analyzing resting-state brain networks faces challenges due to high heterogeneity and noise correlation between subjects. This study proposes a brain structure learning-guided multi-view graph representation learning method to address the limitations of current brain network analysis and improve the diagnostic accuracy (ACC) of mental disorders. Methods: We first used multiple thresholds to generate different sparse levels of brain networks. Subsequently, we introduced graph pooling to optimize the brain network representation by reducing noise edges and data inconsistency, thereby providing more reliable input for subsequent graph convolutional networks (GCNs). Following this, we designed a multi-view GCN to comprehensively capture the complexity and variability of brain structure. Finally, we employed an attention-based adaptive module to adjust the contributions of different views, facilitating their fusion. Considering that the Smith atlas offers superior characterization of resting-state brain networks, we utilized the Smith atlas to construct the graph network. Results: Experiments on two mental disorder datasets, the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) dataset and the Mexican Cocaine Use Disorders (SUDMEX CONN) dataset, show that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, achieving nearly 75% ACC and 70% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on both datasets. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that our method of combining multi-view graph learning and brain structure learning can effectively capture crucial structural information in brain networks while facilitating the acquisition of feature information from diverse perspectives, thereby improving the performance of brain network analysis.

Indexed as

brain structure learningGraph representation learningmulti-view graph learningresting-state brain network

Identifiers

PMID39281155
PMCPMC11400701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.