ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Evaluation of prenatal and postnatal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of fetal double bubble sign.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of congenital duodenal obstruction in neonates: a 10-year retrospective cohort study from a National Children's Hospital.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Annular Pancreas: Insights Into the Diagnosis of a Rare Anatomical Malformation in Pediatric Patients.Cureus · 2025Article
- Ultrasound detection of biliary atresia splenic malformation syndrome from prenatal to postnatal: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical Analysis of Congenital Duodenal Obstruction and the Role of Annular Pancreas.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Annular Pancreas in a 13-Year-Old Boy: A Delayed Clinical Presentation of a Congenital Anomaly Highlighting Challenges of Diagnosis.International medical case reports journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) is commonly detected antenatally through the presence of the "double bubble" sign on prenatal ultrasound, denoting dilatation of the stomach and duodenum. Subsequent postnatal ultrasonography plays a pivotal role in determining the causes of obstruction, thereby informing surgical strategies and neonatal management. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of postnatal ultrasonography in comparison to that of prenatal ultrasound and surgical findings in a cohort of 43 patients with fetal double bubble sign. Methods: A total of 43 patients, comprising 24 males and 19 females, who exhibited double bubble sign on prenatal ultrasound were subjected to postnatal ultrasound assessment at a tertiary care facility during the 2018-2023 period. The accuracy of both pre-and postnatal ultrasonography in the identification and diagnosis of CDO, as well as its underlying causes, was compared to that of the established gold standard of surgical findings. Results: The accuracy rates for prenatal and postnatal ultrasonic diagnosis of CDO were 97.7% (42/43) and 100% (42/42), respectively. In terms of etiological diagnosis, prenatal and postnatal ultrasound correctly identified the causes of obstruction in 45.2% (19/42) and 81.0% (34/42) of cases, respectively, as confirmed by surgical intervention. Conclusions: The presence of the prenatal double bubble sign serves as a highly reliable indicator for CDO. Additionally, postnatal ultrasonography proved to be a valuable tool in refining the diagnosis and determining the underlying causes of obstruction in neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.