Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281101›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Development and external validation of temporal fusion transformer models for continuous intraoperative blood pressure forecasting.

Lorenz Kapral, Christoph Dibiasi, Natasa Jeremic, Stefan Bartos, Sybille Behrens, Aylin Bilir, Clemens Heitzinger, Oliver Kimberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lorenz KapralMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Christoph DibiasiMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Natasa JeremicMedical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090 Wien, Austria.
Stefan BartosMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Sybille BehrensMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Aylin BilirMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Clemens HeitzingerTechnical University Vienna, Department of Informatics, Research Unit Machine Learning, Favoritenstraße 9/11, Vienna 1040 Wien, Austria.
Oliver KimbergerMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During surgery, intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative morbidity and should therefore be avoided. Predicting the occurrence of hypotension in advance may allow timely interventions to prevent hypotension. Previous prediction models mostly use high-resolution waveform data, which is often not available. Methods: We utilised a novel temporal fusion transformer (TFT) algorithm to predict intraoperative blood pressure trajectories 7 min in advance. We trained the model with low-resolution data (sampled every 15 s) from 73,009 patients who were undergoing general anaesthesia for non-cardiothoracic surgery between January 1, 2017, and December 30, 2020, at the General Hospital of Vienna, Austria. The data set contained information on patient demographics, vital signs, medication, and ventilation. The model was evaluated using an internal (n = 8113) and external test set (n = 5065) obtained from the openly accessible Vital Signs Database. Findings: In the internal test set, the mean absolute error for predicting mean arterial blood pressure was 0.376 standard deviations-or 4 mmHg-and 0.622 standard deviations-or 7 mmHg-in the external test set. We also adapted the TFT model to binarily predict the occurrence of hypotension as defined by mean arterial blood pressure < 65 mmHg in the next one, three, five, and 7 min. Here, model discrimination was excellent, with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.933 in the internal test set and 0.919 in the external test set. Interpretation: Our TFT model is capable of accurately forecasting intraoperative arterial blood pressure using only low-resolution data showing a low prediction error. When used for binary prediction of hypotension, we obtained excellent performance. Funding: No external funding.

Indexed as

Blood pressure forecastingContinuous predictionHaemodynamic monitoringIntraoperative hypotensionMachine learningTemporal fusion transformer

Identifiers

PMID39281101
PMCPMC11402414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.