Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281060›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

Mastication Wear of Two Low Profile Attachment Systems for Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.

Alessandra Nicole Sassi, Claudia Todaro, Gaetano Isola, Ivano Bortolini, Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena, Stefano Storelli, Saturnino Marco Lupi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandra Nicole SassiDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Claudia TodaroDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-4785
Gaetano IsolaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, Catania 95124, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-6992
Ivano BortoliniProsthodontic Lab, Via Driovilla 5, 31050 Miane, Italy.
Ruggero Rodriguez Y BaenaDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1602-1562
Stefano StorelliDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Saturnino Marco LupiDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3165-0631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Edentulism is still a major problem in the world's population today. Implant-retained overdenture has proven to be a valid therapeutic solution in the mandible. This type of rehabilitation requires replacement of the matrices when those reach inadequate retention due to wearing processes. This study is aimed at evaluating the drop in retention of low-profile precision attachments following the application of vertical chewing forces. Two different attachment designs were compared. Methods: This in vitro study simulated an implant-retained overdenture on an edentulous mandible. Two low-profile attachments were compared. Loaded and unloaded sides were considered. Tests were performed by exerting a vertical cyclic force on the prosthesis at the level of the first molar of a hemiarch. Retention tests were performed before and after 400.000 chewing cycles, comparable to one year of use. Results: The presence of vertical load wear was identified and characterized. Retention never fell below the values indicated by the manufacturer. Furthermore, significant differences were identified between the two retention systems. Conclusions: Loss of occlusal load retention is a component that must be evaluated by the clinician during the design of implant-prosthetic rehabilitation, particularly in those cases where elevated occlusal forces or parafunctions are present.

Identifiers

PMID39281060
PMCPMC11401661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.