Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281000›Full record

ArticleGlobal heart2024

A Cross-Sectional Survey of Fixed-Dose Combination Antihypertensive Medicine Prescribing in Twenty-Four Countries, Including Qualitative Insights.

Edel O'Hagan, Daniel McIntyre, Tu Nguyen, Kit Mun Tan, Peter Hanlon, Maha Siddiqui, Dzudie Anastase, Toon Wei Lim, Anezi Uzendu, Tan Van Nguyen and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Global heart, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fixed-dose combinationFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Edel O'HaganWestmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1914-5918
Daniel McIntyreWestmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4854-4050
Tu NguyenThe George Institute for Global Health, Level 18, International Towers 3, 300 Barangaroo Ave, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8836-8920
Kit Mun TanDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1611-3109
Peter HanlonSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears building, Byres Road, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-3934
Maha SiddiquiWestmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
Dzudie AnastaseClinical Research Education, Networking and Consultancy and Department of Medicine, Douala General Hospital, Douala, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0003-4038-4128
Toon Wei LimNational University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, 119074, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-9237
Anezi UzenduDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0576-7510
Tan Van NguyenUniversity of Medicine & Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Min City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-5929-6000
Wei Jin WongSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building, A27 Fisher Rd Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6448-5375
Hui Min KhorDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4066-0738
Pramod KumarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sri Aurobindo Marg, Ansari Nagar, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, Delhi 110029, India.
Timothy UsherwoodWestmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7522-0345
Clara K ChowWestmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-0038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment inertia, non-adherence and non-persistence to medical treatment contribute to poor blood pressure (BP) control worldwide. Fixed dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive medicines simplify prescribing patterns and improve adherence. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines and to understand if these factors differ among doctors worldwide. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted online from June 2023 to January 2024 to recruit doctors. We collaborated with an international network of researchers and clinicians identified through institutional connections. A passive snowballing recruitment strategy was employed, where network members forwarded the survey link to their clinical colleagues. The survey instrument, developed through a literature review, interviews with academic and clinical researchers, and pilot testing, assessed participants perspectives on prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines for hypertension. Participants rated their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) with statements representing six barriers and four facilitators to FDC use. Findings: Data from 191 surveys were available for analysis. 25% (n = 47) of participants worked in high-income countries, 38% (n = 73) in upper-middle income, 25% (n = 48) in lower-middle income, 6% (n = 10) in low-income countries. Forty percent (n = 70) of participants were between 36-45 years of age; two thirds were male. Cost was reported as a barrier to prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines [51% (n = 87) agreeing or strongly agreeing], followed by doctors' confidence in BP measured in clinic [40%, (n = 70)], access [37%, (n = 67)], appointment duration [35%, (n = 61)], concerns about side-effects [(21%, n = 37)], and non-adherence [12%, (n = 21)]. Facilitators to FDC antihypertensive polypills prescribing were clinician facing, such as access to educational supports [79%, (n = 143)], more BP measurement data [67%, (n = 120)], a clinical nudge in health records [61%, (n = 109)] and patient-facing including improved patient health literacy [49%, (n = 88)]. The levels of agreement and strong agreement across all barriers and facilitators were similar for participants working in higher or lower income countries. Across all countries, participants rated FDC antihypertensive medications highly valuable for managing patients with non-adherence, (82% reported high or very high value), for patients with high pill burden (80%). Interpretation: Cost and access were the most common barriers to prescribing FDCs across high- and low-income countries. While greater educational support for clinicians was perceived as the leading potential facilitator of FDC use, this seems unlikely to be effective without addressing access.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesDrug CombinationsDrug MonitoringDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Combinationsantihypertensive medicationsfixed dose combinationsglobal healthcare surveyhypertensionpolypills

Identifiers

PMID39281000
PMCPMC11396169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.