ArticleToxicon: X2024
Plug and play virus-like particles for the generation of anti-toxin antibodies.
Article in Toxicon: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant Viral Vectors for Vaccine Development.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Nanodiamond-in-Oil Emulsion with Snake Venom to Enhance Potent Antibody Induction in Mice and Rabbits.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Snakebite is a major global health concern, for which antivenom remains the only approved treatment to neutralise the harmful effects of the toxins. However, some medically important toxins are poorly immunogenic, resulting in reduced efficacy of the final product. Boosting the immunogenicity of these toxins in the commercial antivenom immunising mixtures could be an effective strategy to improve the final dose efficacy, and displaying snake antigens on Virus-like particles (VLPs) is one method for this. However, despite some applications in the field of snakebite, VLPs have yet to be explored in methods that could be practical at an antivenom manufacturing scale. Here we describe the utilisation of a "plug and play" VLP system to display immunogenic linear peptide epitopes from three finger toxins (3FTxs) and generate anti-toxin antibodies. Rabbits were immunised with VLPs displaying individual consensus linear epitopes and their antibody responses were characterised by immunoassay. Of the three experimental consensus sequences, two produced antibodies capable of recognising the consensus peptides, whilst only one of these could also recognise native whole toxins. Further characterisation of antibodies raised against this peptide demonstrated a sub-class specific response, and that these were able to elicit partially neutralising antibody responses, resulting in increased survival times in a murine snakebite envenoming model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.