Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280941›Full record

ReviewJournal of lifestyle medicine2024

Stroke Rehabilitation in India: Addressing Gender Inequities.

Nawaj Mehtab Pathan, Rahul Saxena, Chandan Kumar, Sampada Kamlakar, Ankita Yelikar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of lifestyle medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nawaj Mehtab PathanDepartment of Neurophysiotherapy, MGM Institute of Physiotherapy, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5143-1036
Rahul SaxenaDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Allied Health Sciences (SAHS), Sharda University, Greater Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-7882
Chandan KumarDepartment of Physiotherapy, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2387-120X
Sampada KamlakarDepartment of Neurophysiotherapy, Royal College of Physiotherapy, Malegaon, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-2006
Ankita YelikarDepartment of Neurophysiotherapy, Royal College of Physiotherapy, Malegaon, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1490-4495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender inequality has a significant and complex impact on stroke recovery and rehabilitation outcomes. Moreover, the influence of gender on post-stroke recovery is multifactorial, primarily biological, social, and behavioral issues. The recovery paths for men and women may have different outlines in relation to stroke occurrence, injury sites, and hormonal effects. These collectively influence the effective summarization of recovery strategies and outcomes. Furthermore, societal and cultural elements play a significant role in shaping access to resources, social support networks, and participation in rehabilitation programs, which consequently affect the outcomes. Considering the gender-specific nuances is important in developing effective rehabilitation strategies. Furthermore, effective stroke rehabilitation programs are needed to achieve equitable and improved recovery outcomes for all stroke survivors and to create inclusive interventions that consider these differences.

Indexed as

Gender equityMenRecovery of functionStrokeWomen

Identifiers

PMID39280941
PMCPMC11391334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.