ArticleGastro hep advances2024
Algorithm Development and Early Performance Evaluation of a Next-Generation Multitarget Stool DNA Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-Target Colorectal Cancer Screening Test for the Detection of Colorectal Advanced Adenomatous Polyps and Cancer: DeeP-C Study
Blood and Stool Sample Collection in Subjects With a Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer or Colorectal Lesion: Act Fast
Blood and Stool Sample Collection in Subjects Participating in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Act Bold
Clinical Validation of An Optimized Multi-Target Stool DNA (Mt-sDNA 2.0) Test, for Colorectal Cancer Screening "BLUE-C"
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic value of genetic and epigenetic biomarker panels for colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others misunderstand stool testing for colorectal cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Comparison of Benefit-to-Burden Ratios for Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests in the U.S.: A Decision Analytical Modeling Approach.AJPM focus · 2026Article
- Value of Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening: Integrating Real-World Adherence, Detection, and Prevention in a Cohort-Based Modeling Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Application of the Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Guiding Principles for Non-invasive Testing to Multi-target Stool DNA: A Case Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- Utility of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) assay is a noninvasive average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test. A new biomarker panel was developed for a next-generation test to improve specificity while maintaining/increasing sensitivity. We aimed first to establish an algorithm and cutoff for the next-generation mt-sDNA test and then to validate it using archived samples from the pivotal DeeP-C study (NCT01397747) of the first-generation test. Methods: Algorithm development and cross-validation included 3011 samples from 2 specimen collection studies (NCT03821948 and NCT03789162). The algorithm and cutoff were locked before validation. Validation test set samples included 57 CRC, 583 advanced precancerous lesions (APLs), and 7022 samples negative for CRC or APLs from the DeeP-C study, which prospectively enrolled average-risk, asymptomatic adults aged 50-84 years before screening colonoscopy. Next-generation biomarkers included methylated DNA markers ceramide synthase 4 gene, leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 4 gene, serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 56 kDa regulatory subunit gamma isoform gene, and zinc finger DHHC-type containing 1 gene (reference marker), and fecal hemoglobin. Primary validation end points were CRC sensitivity and specificity for the absence of advanced neoplasia. Secondary end points included APL sensitivity and specificity for non-neoplastic findings or negative colonoscopy. Results: Cross-validation and best-fit results from algorithm development closely matched, confirming algorithm reliability and reproducibility. For the test set, next-generation mt-sDNA test sensitivity was 93.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.0%-98.1%) for CRC and 48.4% (95% CI, 44.2%-52.5%) for APLs. Specificity was 88.5% (95% CI, 87.7%-89.2%) for the absence of advanced neoplasia and 90.4% (95% CI, 89.5%-91.2%) for the combination of non-neoplastic findings or negative colonoscopy. Conclusion: Based on archived samples, the next-generation mt-sDNA test demonstrated promising CRC screening performance characteristics that will be further assessed in a prospective clinical validation study (BLUE-C; NCT04144738).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.