Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280904›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2024

Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach.

Sofia Guerra-Paiva, Irene Carrillo, José Mira, Joana Fernandes, Reinhard Strametz, Eva Gil-Hernández, Paulo Sousa

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06888297 (European Certification of Interventions in Support of Second Victims), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06888297 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

European Certification of Interventions in Support of Second Victims (RESCUE)

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsSecond Victim Phenomenon, Occupational Stress, Healthcare Workforce Well-Being, Patient Safety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sofia Guerra-PaivaNOVA University of Lisbon, Public Health Research Centre, Lisboa, Portugal.
Irene CarrilloDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain.
José MiraDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain.
Joana FernandesNational School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Eva Gil-HernándezFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Paulo SousaNOVA University of Lisbon, Public Health Research Centre, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations. Methods: A three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference. Results: From an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution. Conclusion: This study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsProgram EvaluationDelphi TechniqueHumansQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesevaluationindicatorspatient safetyprogramssecond victim

Identifiers

PMID39280904
PMCPMC11392755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.