ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024
Mass chemotherapy with niclosamide for the control of
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multiphase Implementation of Ring Treatment: A Community-Engaged Control Program for T. Solium taeniasis/cysticercosis in Northern Peru.Research square · 2026Article
- Reprogramming the Tumor Oncobiosphere: Bioactive Nanohybrid Materials for Reversing Therapeutic Pseudo-Resistance.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Mass treatment of tapeworms for Taenia solium eradication.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Potential ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Harnessing Nanohybridized Niclosamide for Precision Mpox Therapeutics.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Synthetic niclosamide-loaded controlled-release nanospheres with high solubility and stability exerting multiple effects againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Mass drug administration (MDA) with niclosamide (NSM) can be used to control taeniasis, the cause of neurocysticercosis. NSM is 84.3% effective against taeniasis and is considered safe as it is not absorbed from the intestinal tract. However, information on its safety and effectiveness during MDA is limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of NSM and reported adverse events (AEs) during a cysticercosis elimination program in Tumbes, Peru. Methods: Three rounds of NSM at 4-month intervals were offered to 77,397 eligible residents. We revisited all participants in their homes 72 h after each round to collect information regarding AEs. We also collected post-treatment stool samples to diagnose taeniasis after the first round, followed by a second sample at 30 days from those infected to evaluate NSM's effectiveness. Findings: During implementation, 68,751 individuals were administered at least one dose of NSM (mean age 29 years, SD 20; 52% male), and 65,551 (95.3%) were visited post-treatment. 988 (1.5%) reported experiencing at least one AE. Almost all AEs (99.2%) were of mild intensity, with no severe AEs recorded. Of 211 participants diagnosed with taeniasis, 188 provided a follow-up stool sample 30-days after treatment and 141 were cured (treatment effectiveness 75.0%). Older age and higher coproantigen levels were significantly associated with treatment failure. Interpretation: MDA with NSM is safe in Funding: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.