Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280785›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

Comparing different session regimens of electroacupuncture for chronic plantar fasciitis: Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Jiaxiang Shi, Ruimin Jiao, Yan Liu, Xinkun Liu, Yingxin Sun, Hangyu Shi, Ning Gao, Zhishun Liu, Jun Liang, Weiming Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06284993 (Acupuncture of Different Treatment Frequency in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06284993 narecruitingnot on this map

Acupuncture of Different Treatment Frequency in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical SciencesRan2024 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsPlantar Fasciitis, ChronicArmselectroacupuncture(more frequent), electroacupuncture(less frequent)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiaxiang ShiDepartment of Acupuncture, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Ruimin JiaoDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan LiuKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xinkun LiuDepartment of Acupuncture, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Yingxin SunDepartment of Acupuncture, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Hangyu ShiDepartment of Acupuncture, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Ning GaoDepartment of Acupuncture, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Zhishun LiuDepartment of Acupuncture, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Jun LiangDepartment of Acupuncture, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Weiming WangDepartment of Acupuncture, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of plantar heel pain, and previous studies found that acupuncture is effective for relieving pain in patients with PF. Nevertheless, the impact of different sessions of electroacupuncture on PF has not been investigated through randomized, controlled trials. Methods/design: This is a two parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, consisting of a four-week treatment phase followed by a 12-week follow-up. Eighty patients with chronic PF will be recruited and randomly allocated to receive 12 (three sessions per week; the multiple electroacupuncture weekly treatment group (group M)) or four (one session per week; single electroacupuncture weekly treatment group (group S)) sessions of electroacupuncture treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome to be studied is the response rate, defined as a minimum of 50 % improvement in most severe pain intensity with first steps in the morning, compared with baseline. We will perform all analyses based on the intention-to-treat principle, with differences considered significant when the Discussion: This prospective trial will provide high-quality evidence on evaluating the efficacy and safety of different electroacupuncture sessions (one session per week versus three sessions per week) for chronic PF. This study aims to contribute in produce up-to-date, rigorous evidence on the most effective frequency of electroacupuncture in managing chronic PF.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT06284993. Registered on February 17, 2024.

Indexed as

Clinical trialElectroacupuncturePlantar fasciitis

Identifiers

PMID39280785
PMCPMC11400600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.