ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Evaluation of monocular and binocular contrast perception on virtual reality head-mounted displays.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Visualization of medical images on a virtual reality (VR) head-mounted display (HMD) requires binocular fusion of a stereoscopic pair of graphical views. However, current image quality assessment on VR HMDs for medical applications has been primarily limited to time-consuming monocular optical bench measurement on a single eyepiece. Approach: As an alternative to optical bench measurement to quantify the image quality on VR HMDs, we developed a WebXR test platform to perform contrast perceptual experiments that can be used for binocular image quality assessment. We obtained monocular and binocular contrast sensitivity responses (CSRs) from participants on a Meta Quest 2 VR HMD using varied interpupillary distance (IPD) configurations. Results: The perceptual result shows that contrast perception on VR HMDs is primarily affected by optical aberration of the VR HMD. As a result, monocular CSR degrades at a high spatial frequency greater than 4 cycles per degree when gazing at the periphery of the display field of view, especially for mismatched IPD settings consistent with optical bench measurements. On the contrary, binocular contrast perception is dominated by the monocular view with superior image quality measured by the contrast. Conclusions: We developed a test platform to investigate monocular and binocular contrast perception by performing perceptual experiments. The test method can be used to evaluate monocular and/or binocular image quality on VR HMDs for potential medical applications without extensive optical bench measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.