Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280766›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science. Nano2024

V Alcolea-Rodriguez, R Portela, V Calvino-Casilda, M A Bañares

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science. Nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V Alcolea-RodriguezInstituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, ICP-CSIC Marie Curie 2 28049-Madrid Spain valcolear@gmail.com raquel.portela@csic.es miguel.banares@csic.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2392-0817
R PortelaInstituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, ICP-CSIC Marie Curie 2 28049-Madrid Spain valcolear@gmail.com raquel.portela@csic.es miguel.banares@csic.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1882-4759
V Calvino-CasildaDepartamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica, Control, Telemática y Química Aplicada a la Ingeniería, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales, UNED Juan del Rosal 12 28040-Madrid Spain vcalvino@ieec.uned.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-2164
M A BañaresInstituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, ICP-CSIC Marie Curie 2 28049-Madrid Spain valcolear@gmail.com raquel.portela@csic.es miguel.banares@csic.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-4468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methanol probe chemisorption quantifies the number of reactive sites at the surface of engineered nanomaterials, enabling normalization per reactive site in reactivity and toxicity tests, rather than per mass or physical surface area. Subsequent temperature-programmed surface reaction (TPSR) of chemisorbed methanol identifies the reactive nature of surface sites (acidic, basic, redox or combination thereof) and their reactivity. Complementary to the methanol assay, a dithiothreitol (DTT) probe oxidation reaction is used to evaluate the oxidation capacity. These acellular approaches to quantify the number, nature, and reactivity of surface sites constitute a new approach methodology (NAM) for site-specific classification of nanomaterials. As a proof of concept, CuO, CeO

Identifiers

PMID39280766
PMCPMC11392058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.