Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280756›Full record

ArticleTobacco use insights2024

Trends in Level of Implementation of the WHO FCTC Article 5.3 in India.

Shalini Bassi, Mansi Chopra, Aastha Chugh, Shivangi Das, Upendra Bhojani, Gaurang P Nazar, Adhip Amin, Jhumki Dutta, Pranay Lal, P C Gupta and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco use insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. From Complicity to Protection of Children? Contradictions in India's Tobacco Control are a Global Issue.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shalini BassiHRIDAY, New Delhi, India.
Mansi ChopraHRIDAY, New Delhi, India.
Aastha ChughHRIDAY, New Delhi, India.
Shivangi DasHRIDAY, New Delhi, India.
Upendra BhojaniInstitute of Public Health, Bengaluru, India.
Gaurang P NazarHRIDAY, New Delhi, India.
Adhip AminInstitute of Public Health, Bengaluru, India.
Jhumki DuttaPartners in Change, New Delhi, India.
Pranay LalInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, New Delhi, India.
P C GuptaHealis-Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Mumbai, India.
Monika AroraHRIDAY, New Delhi, India.

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/17/1/503346DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHS/22/1/506533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The tobacco industry intends to ensure continuing marketing of tobacco products by influencing and interfering in tobacco control policies. This paper assessed trends of tobacco industry interference (TII), the level of implementation, and the government's response to enforcing Article 5.3 guidelines in India to safeguard tobacco control efforts from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry. Methods: We conducted a descriptive comparative analysis of four consecutive India TII Indexes (January 2018-December 2021) based on the seven key 5.3 recommendations and twenty indicators to capture (i) the Level of Industry Participation, (ii) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities, (iii) Benefits to the Tobacco Industry, (iv) Forms of Unnecessary Interactions, (v) Transparency, (vi) Conflict of Interest, and (vii) Preventive Measures. The Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance's (SEATCA) TII Index was used to undertake this assessment. Results: The comparative analysis showed that the overall score of the India TII Indexes over the years decreased from 72 (2018) to 57 (2021). Improvements were shown over the years in adherence to Article 5.3 for limiting unnecessary interactions with the tobacco industry, avoiding conflicts of interest, and having preventive measures. However, major gaps were observed in restricting industry participation, regulating their so-called CSR, providing benefits to the industry in the form of incentives, exemptions, and maintaining transparency. Conclusion: The study provides the status of implementing Article 5.3 and its guidelines in India. Given the gaps in the existing measures, India needs to comprehensively adopt Article 5.3 guidelinesin all states and union territories adopting whole-of-government approach. There is an urgent need to establish an observatory for periodic compilation of the TII indexes to monitor the tobacco industry and report violations at the national and sub-national levels.

Indexed as

article 5.3Indiatobacco industry interferenceWHO FCTC

Identifiers

PMID39280756
PMCPMC11393799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.