Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280729›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024

Comparative Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance: Standard E TB Feron ELISA vs QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for Latent Tuberculosis Infection Detection in Diverse Risk Groups in Bangladesh.

Mohammad Khaja Mafij Uddin, Ashabul Islam, Maha Sultana Jabin, Tahmina Alam, Salwa Khair, Jannatul Ferdous, Rumana Nasrin, S M Mazidur Rahman, Stephane Pouzol, Jonathan Hoffmann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic Performance of New Commercial Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohammad Khaja Mafij UddinInfectious Diseases Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ashabul IslamInfectious Diseases Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0007-9479-2860
Maha Sultana JabinInfectious Diseases Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tahmina AlamNutrition Research Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Salwa KhairInfectious Diseases Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0009-6551-1403
Jannatul FerdousInfectious Diseases Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rumana NasrinInfectious Diseases Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
S M Mazidur RahmanInfectious Diseases Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-2887-6250
Stephane PouzolScientific and Medical Department, Fondation Mérieux, Lyon, France.
Jonathan HoffmannScientific and Medical Department, Fondation Mérieux, Lyon, France.
Sayera BanuInfectious Diseases Division, Icddr,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5121-1962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Around one-quarter of the global population has latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). If left untreated, LTBI has 5-10% lifetime risk of developing into TB. Interferon-gamma release Assays (IGRAs) are more sensitive than the tuberculin skin test for LTBI detection. However, the high cost and complexity of IGRAs are barriers to adoption in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a more affordable IGRA, Standard E TB-Feron (TBE), among different risk groups in Bangladesh. Methods: 532 participants of all age groups were enrolled from the TB Screening and Treatment Centers and Dhaka Hospital of icddr,b between June and September 2023. The participants were categorized into four risk groups: healthy people, healthcare workers/ attendants of TB patients, patients with microbiologically confirmed TB, and people with a history of TB. The diagnostic performance of TBE was compared to QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) for all groups. GeneXpert, culture, and microscopy were used to confirm TB microbiologically. Results: TBE had an overall agreement of 85.9% (95% CI, 82.5% to 88.7%), positive percent agreement of 86.1% (95% CI, 80.6% to 90.5%), and negative percent agreement of 85.7% (95% CI, 81.3% -89.4%) with QFT-Plus. Among 81 culture-positive patients, TBE and QFT-Plus were positive for 60 (74.1%) and 62 (76.5%) respectively. Among healthy people, TBE and QFT results were positive for 49 (24.5%) and 59 (29.5%) respectively. Among health workers and contacts, TBE and QFT-Plus were positive for 79 (39.5%) and 73 (35.5%) respectively. Conclusion: We found a substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa of 0.71) between TBE and QFT-Plus in detecting LTBI across different groups, suggesting its potential as a cost-effective diagnostic tool. Implementation of TBE in routine clinical practice could increase accessibility to LTBI diagnosis, facilitating the timely initiation of preventative therapy, and leading to a reduction of active TB incidence.

Indexed as

interferon-gamma release assaylatent tuberculosis infectionQuantiFERON-TB Gold PlusStandard E TB-Feron ELISA

Identifiers

PMID39280729
PMCPMC11397246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.