Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280697›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024

Guidance Directed Care of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Healthcare System-Based Experience.

Eleanor Christenson, Deeksha Acharya, Kathryn Berlacher, Agnes Koczo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Impact of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway on the management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Specialized clinics for patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleanor ChristensonUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Deeksha AcharyaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Kathryn BerlacherUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Agnes KoczoUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Data on treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has evolved with guidance from national societies beginning around 2018. Given emerging guidance and relatively uncommon presentation of SCAD, we hypothesized that a specialized SCAD clinic would improve guidance-based care. Methods: We utilized a system-wide electronic medical record search to identify individuals with SCAD diagnosis from 2018 to 2023. All diagnostic angiograms were reviewed to verify diagnosis. We analyzed frequency of guidance-based care since 2018 system-wide. We also compared guidance-based care for individuals with index visits to the SCAD outpatient clinic as compared to non-SCAD clinic providers from initiation of specialty clinic in 2021. Results: Differences were observed in pregnancy and contraception discussions (88 % vs 0 %, p < 0.001) among pre-menopausal individuals in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics. Safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in menopausal women was addressed more by SCAD clinic providers (85 % vs 7 %, p < 0.001). There was more fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) screening in SCAD clinic (100 % vs 30 %, p < 0.001). Among individuals with migraines, there was more discussion of triggering medications (triptans) in SCAD clinic (80 % vs 14 %, p = 0.008). In individuals prescribed statins not by primary prevention guidelines and without atherosclerosis, there was a trend toward more discussion of statin use in SCAD clinic follow up vs non-SCAD clinic providers (63 % vs 17 %, p = 0.06). Conclusions: Individuals with follow up in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics were more likely to have future pregnancy and contraception counseling, discussion of HRT safety, and FMD screening following index outpatient visit. Future quality improvement initiatives will target these aspects of guidance-based care among non-SCAD clinic providers with integration into cardiology fellow training.

Indexed as

Guidance-based careSCAD clinicSpontaneous coronary artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID39280697
PMCPMC11400990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.