Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280672›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2024

Microenergy shockwave therapies for female stress urinary incontinence.

Guiting Lin, Tom F Lue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guiting LinKnuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Tom F LueKnuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is one of the pelvic floor disorders affecting tens of million of women worldwide. In general, non-surgical options have relatively limited efficacy. The most effective treatment is mid-urethral sling surgery which carries substantial risks of perioperative and postoperative complications. Regenerative therapy with the injection of several types of stem cells and stem cell products is promising but further investigation is needed before clinical implementation can be considered. In recent years, the application of microenergy therapy as a non-invasive treatment for SUI has received increasing attention. Preclinical animal studies of these models have demonstrated that low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) and microenergy acoustic pulse (MAP) therapy are capable of regenerating urethral sphincter tissue and pelvic floor muscles leading to improved urinary continence. One pilot clinical trial with Li-ESWT also reported improved quality of life in women with SUI as well as the symptoms. The objective of this review is to summarize the potential mechanisms associated with Li-ESWT and MAP therapies of SUI: (I) activation of tissue-resident stem cells; (II) regeneration of musculature in the urethra and pelvic floor; (III) improvement in biomechanical property of pelvic floor muscles; (IV) modulation of cellular signaling pathways. Further studies of the molecular mechanisms, optimal treatment dosage and schedule, and potential long-term side effects are needed to provide this non-invasive regenerative therapy for millions of women with SUI.

Indexed as

Low intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT)microenergy acoustic pulse therapy (MAP therapy)muscleregenerationstress urinary incontinence (SUI)

Identifiers

PMID39280672
PMCPMC11399057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.