ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024
Modified dorsal recumbent position versus lithotomy position for flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The lithotomy position (LP) may pose limitations and discomfort for elderly patients and those with a history of lower limb surgery, potentially leading to an increased risk of complications. And the LP is the conventional position during flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy for the treatment of ureteral calculi. However, it has some disadvantages, such as peripheral nerve injury and deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs, etc. Therefore, we performed a new approach, which is named as modified dorsal recumbent position (MDRP). Currently, there is a lack of systematic analysis and standardization regarding the surgical positioning for flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The objective of the study was to assess whether there were any disparities in the overall duration of the procedure when comparing the MDRP with the LP. The investigation of the optimal position for flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy is essential for enhancing patient safety and comfort. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. A total of 144 patients with renal or ureteral calculi from April 2021 to June 2022 were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomized to the MDRP group (n=72) or LP group (n=72). The patient's demographics, the placement of the surgical position (time of position placement, time of disinfection and towel laying, time of position return, degree of medical fatigue) and the operation safety (time of operation, time of ureteroscope from bladder neck to ureteral orifice, heart rate, blood pressure) of two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: Between the two groups, the body positioning time (93.8±31.6 Conclusions: This trial showed that the MDRP could not only effectively shorten the operation time, shorten the time from the bladder neck to the ureteral orifice of the ureteroscopic lithotripsy, but also place the patient's body in a functional position, stabilize the blood pressure during the operation, improve the comfort of the patient. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100053416).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.