ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024
A single-institution experience with the Optilume Urethral Drug Coated Balloon for management of urethral stricture disease.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Internal urethrotomy versus Optilume™ drug-coated balloon dilatation for the management of anterior urethral strictures: morbidity comparison of the techniques.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Applications and challenges of paclitaxel- coated balloons beyond coronary atherosclerotic heart disease.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Review
- Prophylactic adjuvant therapy for postoperative recurrence of urethral stricture: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Article
- Current management strategies for bladder neck stenosis and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Optilume drug-coated balloon dilation for treatment of post-prostate cancer ablative therapy urethral stricture: a case series.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Surgical management of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis.Investigative and clinical urology · 2025Review
- Article
- Review of the role of paclitaxel urethral balloon dilation for initial treatment of newly diagnosed short bulbar strictures.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Outcomes of drug-coated balloon urethral dilation in patients with stricture recurrence after urethroplasty.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Optilume, a minimally invasive solution for BPH and urethral stricture: what we know, what we need? an EAU endourology scoping review.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Urethral Strictures: Is This the Future? A Review of the Current Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon for Acute Urinary Retention After Failed Treatment for Complex Recurrent Urethral Stricture Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urethral stricture disease is detrimental to quality of life. The Optilume Urethral Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) offers a solution utilizing a paclitaxel-coated balloon to expand strictures and prevent recurrence. Following the ROBUST trials, it has been proposed that DCB is more effective than conventional endoscopic management for recurrent, small anterior urethral strictures. Our study provides insights into practical applications and outcomes using DCB for urethral stricture disease. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent DCB for urethral strictures at our institution from November 2022 to August 2023 with follow-up evaluated through January 2024. Demographics, stricture characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Primary endpoint was need for repeat intervention as determined by symptomatic burden and subsequently postoperative post-void residual if obtained. Secondary endpoint was complication rate. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA/BE17.0 software to create Kaplan-Meier curves for time to repeat intervention after treatment with DCB. Results: Of 43 patients, 16 had no prior treatment. The other 27 had endoscopic treatment and of this group, 11 also had additional urethroplasty. Stricture etiologies included 20 iatrogenic, 14 idiopathic, 5 radiation-related, 2 inflammatory, and 2 traumatic. Stricture locations were 2 fossa navicularis, 7 pendulous, 17 bulbar, 7 membranous, 3 prostatic, and 7 bladder neck contractures. Mean balloon dilation lasted 8.4±2.7 minutes. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 150 days postoperatively and the mean duration of follow-up for the cohort was 290.3±87.0 days. The average postoperative post-void residual was 33.4±90.6 milliliters. Two patients had immediate complications: 1 with urinary retention after catheter removal requiring suprapubic tube placement and 1 with urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics. Four patients required repeat interventions: 1 endoscopic dilation, 1 graft urethroplasty, and 2 repeat DCB procedures. Mean time to repeat intervention was 203.5±82.6 days, and no patient required repeat intervention within 145 days of initial surgery. Conclusions: DCB offers a safe and less invasive treatment for both treatment-naïve and recurrent urethral strictures with paclitaxel coating to prevent recurrence. Repeat intervention was not required for 90.7% of our cohort within an average follow-up duration of 9 months postoperatively. As DCB grows in clinical use, investigation into its long-term efficacy is justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.