Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280501›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Humanism and Psychosis: Working With Patients Who Have Potential Medical Comorbidities Along With Mental Illness.

Mona Singh, Davin Agustines

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mona SinghOsteopathic Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Davin AgustinesPsychiatry, Olive View University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marginalized groups, such as Black participants experiencing homelessness and diagnosed with schizophrenia, often face significant barriers to care. Improvements in treatment can be achieved by incorporating patient views, addressing stigmas, avoiding medical jargon, respecting patient preferences, and demonstrating transparency and positive affect. We discuss one example in our case report where a newly unhoused woman with schizophrenia, highlighting the impact of medical mistrust, discrimination, and ineffective communication in mental health care. We retrospectively used the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score to assess the severity of the patient's psychiatric condition after her workup. The severity of the BPRS scale is graded as mild (31-40 total score), moderate (41-52 total score), and severe (above 52 total score). Using this scale and our case report, we aim to highlight the importance of emphasizing the rationale of the plan of care to patients, explaining their diagnoses, and reasoning of diagnostics without using medical jargon.

Indexed as

marginalizedmedical mistrustpatient-centered care healthcare disparitiespatients experiencing homelessnessschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39280501
PMCPMC11399472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.