ArticleCureus2024
Study of the Clinical Profiling and Assessment of Poisoning Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Accidental and intentional poisoning is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Pesticide poisoning is particularly common in India, where a large percentage of the population works in agriculture. This study aims to evaluate admission profiles, management trends, and outcome status among poisoning cases in a tertiary care hospital. Methodology A prospective observational study was carried out from May to July 2022 in the medicine ward of a tertiary care hospital, which is associated with a government medical college. Demographic characteristics, history of poisoning, clinical presentation at the time of admission, and intervention for treatment were recorded once the patient was diagnosed with poisoning or when there was a suspicion. Data regarding outcomes was also collected from this section. The appropriateness of the decontamination, support, and specific treatments was assessed. The collected data was subjected to descriptive statistical analysis. Results The most common agent was pesticides, involved in 44 (43.56%) cases out of a total of 101 poisoning cases, with the predominant subtype being organophosphate. Bites accounted for 18 (17.82%) cases, mainly snake bites. Household products were responsible for eight (7.92%) cases, and medicinal products for four (3.96%) cases. Decontamination, when indicated, was properly applied in 98 (97.02%) cases; supportive treatments were administered in 95 (94.05%) cases; and specific detoxifying measures were taken in 59 (58.41%) cases. A majority of the patients (60, or 59.41%) reached the hospital within three hours of poisoning, which dramatically reduced morbidity and mortality. Conclusion In summary, the study indicates that pesticide poisoning is prevalent in rural India, and, as such, there is an urgent need for appropriate regulation of agrochemicals and behavioural education to protect farmers. On average, the appropriateness of decontamination and supportive treatments was high (i.e., >85%), reflecting adequate initial responses. In contrast, the low level of appropriateness for specific treatments highlights gaps regarding institutional medical protocols and training. There is a need to educate the public about timely medical intervention, which can help in decreasing the mortality and morbidity associated with cases of poisoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.