Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280454›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Evaluating the Success of Preformed Resin Bonded Composite Strip Crowns for the Primary Central Incisor in Restoring Carious Primary Canine Teeth: A Retrospective Analysis.

Balaji Suresh, Rajasekar Gunasekaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Prefabricated zirconia crowns versus alternative full-coverage restorations for primary anterior teeth: a systematic review of clinical outcomes.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Balaji SureshPediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Rajasekar GunasekaranPediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Restoration of primary canine teeth in pediatric dentistry requires a balance of functional, biological, and esthetic factors. Stainless steel crowns, while effective for posterior restorations, often have patient acceptance issues due to esthetic limitations. Resin-bonded composite strip crowns have gained traction for anterior restorations due to their superior esthetic qualities and repairability. However, their long-term performance in primary canines characterized by unique morphological and functional demands has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study investigates the efficacy of resin-bonded incisor strip crowns in primary canines over three years, assessing their functional durability, biological integrity, and esthetic performance to provide a comprehensive evaluation of their long-term success in this application. Methods This retrospective observational study, conducted from September 2023 to December 2023 at the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, received ethical approval from the Institutional Human Ethical Committee (IHEC/SDC/PEDO-2103/23/131). Dental records from January 2020 to December 2020 were reviewed by two investigators to identify children aged six years or younger who had undergone pulpectomy in primary canine teeth and were restored with resin-bonded incisor strip crowns. Exclusions included records with missing contact details or post-treatment radiographs. The purpose was to ensure a three-year review period when contacting patients in 2023. Eligible parents were contacted by phone, informed about the study, and invited for a review. Informed consent was obtained in person. Children with exfoliated primary canines and those whose parents did not sign the consent form were excluded. The restored crowns were evaluated using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria across functional, biological, and esthetic domains by two calibrated examiners. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24 (Released 2016; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), with categorical variables expressed as n (%), inter-examiner reliability assessed by Cohen's kappa, and chi-square test used for goodness of fit, setting significance at 95%. Results Of the 92 primary canines restored with resin-bonded incisor strip crowns, 60 children were evaluated. The retention rate at the three-year follow-up was 50 (83.3%). Functional evaluation revealed that 48 (80%) of crowns maintained surface texture, 42 (70%) preserved form and contour, and 52 (86.6%) demonstrated acceptable occlusion and wear. Biologically, 55 (91.7%) of the crowns had no secondary caries, and 56 (93.4%) had no dental hard tissue defects at the margin. Esthetically, 48 (80%) of crowns retained surface texture, 46 (76.6%) had a satisfactory color match, and 45 (71.6%) exhibited minimal marginal staining. Statistical analysis confirmed significant results for all functional and esthetic parameters (p < 0.05). Conclusion The technique of placing incisor strip crowns in the place of primary canines can be recommended considering its maintenance of functional, biological, and esthetic properties.

Indexed as

composite resinearly childhood caries (ecc)fdi criteriaprimary caninestrip crown technique

Identifiers

PMID39280454
PMCPMC11402461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.