ReviewCureus2024
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning based insights into cardiomyopathy and heart failure research: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- [Artificial intelligence and cardiology in Latin America: a 5-year bibliometric analysis of scientific research].Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2025Article
- Navigating the AI revolution: will radiology sink or soar?Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most cited articles about artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Global research landscape on artificial intelligence in echocardiography from 1997 to 2024: Bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) applications in medicine have been significant over the past 30 years. To monitor current research developments, it is crucial to examine the latest trends in AI adoption across various medical fields. This bibliometric analysis focuses on AI applications in cardiology. Unlike existing literature reviews, this study specifically examines journal articles published in the last decade, sourced from both Scopus and Web of Science databases, to illustrate the recent trends in AI within cardiology. The bibliometric analysis involves a statistical and quantitative evaluation of the literature on AI application in cardiovascular medicine over a defined period. A comprehensive global literature review is conducted to identify key research areas, authors, and their interrelationships through published works. The leading institutions and most influential authors in research on the role of AI in cardiology were located in the United States, the United Kingdom, and China. This study also provides researchers with an overview of the evolution of research in AI and cardiology. The main contribution of this study is to highlight the prominent authors, countries, journals, institutions, keywords, and trends in the development of AI in cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.