Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280395›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Was Not Able to Reliably Predict Poor Outcomes in People With Hemophilia.

Jianzhong Hu, Chen Lu, Bob Rogers, Martin Chandler, Jarren Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jianzhong HuStatistics and Data Science, American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network, Rochester, USA.
Chen LuCenter for Digital Health Innovation, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Bob RogersCenter for Digital Health Innovation, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Martin ChandlerStatistics and Data Science, American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network, Rochester, USA.
Jarren SantosStatistics, SimulStat Incorporated, Solana Beach, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are currently used in the clinical field to improve the outcome predictions on disease diagnosis and prognosis. However, to date, few AI/ML applications have been reported in rare diseases, such as hemophilia. In this study, taking advantage of the ATHNdataset, an extensive repository of hemostasis and thrombosis data, we aimed to demonstrate the application of AI/ML approaches to build predictive models to identify persons with hemophilia (PwH) who are at risk of poor outcome and to inform providers in clinical decision-making towards helping patients prevent long-term complications. Materials and methods This project was carried out in two steps. First, the data were mined from ATHN 7, a subset study of the ATHNdataset, to determine markers that defined "poor outcome." Second, we applied multiple AI/ML approaches on the ATHNdataset to validate our findings and to develop predictive models to identify PwH at risk of poor outcomes. The classical regression-based predictive model was used as a reference to evaluate the performance of various AI/ML models. Results Our models included features similarly distributed to response variables of interest, resulting in a limited ability to distinguish poor outcomes. Low recall (<53%) resulted in no single model reliably predicting poor outcomes out of all actual positive cases. Our results suggest that, to build a more useful AI/ML model, we may need a larger dataset size along with additional features. Furthermore, our results showed that most of the AI/ML models outperformed the classical logistic regression model in both model accuracy and precision. Conclusions Our AI and ML model showed limited ability to predict poor outcomes in people with hemophilia.

Indexed as

ai and machine learningclinical decision-makinghemophiliapoor outcomepredictive model

Identifiers

PMID39280395
PMCPMC11392907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.