ArticleCureus2024
Inside the Brain: Cerebrospinal Fluid Insights in Meningitis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CSF Leukocytes in Intracranial Infections: Diagnostic, Mechanistic, and Therapeutic Insights for Neurocritical Care.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, and Management Strategies of Tuberculous Meningitis.Archives of internal medicine research · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance and clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in suspected central nervous system infections: a prospective comparative study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Our study focused on meningitis, an infection that can spread through the bloodstream as a primary or secondary infection from other body parts, such as sinuses, ears, and lungs. It can affect patients who have experienced trauma or surgery, as well as those with congenital defects like spina bifida. Specifically, we examined bacterial, viral, and tuberculous meningitis (TBM) cases. The primary method for confirming the diagnosis of these types of meningitis is to analyze the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Early diagnosis can utilize cytological and biochemical parameters. Our objective is to determine CSF's cytological and biochemical profile in patients with these specific types of meningitis. Methods A study was carried out at the central pathology lab from October 24, 2017, to April 24, 2018. CSF samples from suspected meningitis patients were examined for various parameters, including hematological, biochemical, microbiological, and cytomorphological aspects and specific tests for bacterial, fungal, and TBM. The study focused on patients aged 16 and above, excluding those under 16, non-compliant patients, and individuals with specific health conditions. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), and the results were presented through the use of mean, standard deviation, and percentages. Statistical tests were utilized to compare categorical variables and mean, with a significance level of p<0.05. Results We included a total of 156 cases, with the mean age of presentation being 56.628 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.0526:1. Of the patients, 81 (52.1%) had been diagnosed with TBM, had elevated adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels of 48.8733±37.43740 IU/L, and CSF lymphocytosis (99%). Additionally, cases of bacterial meningitis showed markedly raised mean total leukocyte count (TLC) of 2085.50±445.47727 cells/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.