Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280394›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Inside the Brain: Cerebrospinal Fluid Insights in Meningitis.

Niharika Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Niharika SinghPathology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Our study focused on meningitis, an infection that can spread through the bloodstream as a primary or secondary infection from other body parts, such as sinuses, ears, and lungs. It can affect patients who have experienced trauma or surgery, as well as those with congenital defects like spina bifida. Specifically, we examined bacterial, viral, and tuberculous meningitis (TBM) cases. The primary method for confirming the diagnosis of these types of meningitis is to analyze the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Early diagnosis can utilize cytological and biochemical parameters. Our objective is to determine CSF's cytological and biochemical profile in patients with these specific types of meningitis. Methods A study was carried out at the central pathology lab from October 24, 2017, to April 24, 2018. CSF samples from suspected meningitis patients were examined for various parameters, including hematological, biochemical, microbiological, and cytomorphological aspects and specific tests for bacterial, fungal, and TBM. The study focused on patients aged 16 and above, excluding those under 16, non-compliant patients, and individuals with specific health conditions. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), and the results were presented through the use of mean, standard deviation, and percentages. Statistical tests were utilized to compare categorical variables and mean, with a significance level of p<0.05. Results We included a total of 156 cases, with the mean age of presentation being 56.628 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.0526:1. Of the patients, 81 (52.1%) had been diagnosed with TBM, had elevated adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels of 48.8733±37.43740 IU/L, and CSF lymphocytosis (99%). Additionally, cases of bacterial meningitis showed markedly raised mean total leukocyte count (TLC) of 2085.50±445.47727 cells/mm

Indexed as

adenosine deaminasecross-sectional studiesearly diagnosisglucosehuman bodyleukocyte countlymphocytosismeningealspinal puncturetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39280394
PMCPMC11402503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.