ArticleCureus2024
T Wave Inversion: A Screening Tool for Rapidly Differentiating Acute Coronary Syndrome and Pulmonary Embolism.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are life-threatening conditions with similar clinical presentations. As current diagnostic tools, such as computed tomography pulmonary angiography, for distinguishing between these two conditions are time-consuming and may not be available in all settings, we tried in this study to devise a diagnostic tool based on electrocardiography to distinguish between ACS and acute PE based on T wave features. Methods Medical records of patients with diagnoses of ACS and acute PE, who were referred to three hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, from March 2019 to March 2021, were evaluated. One expert cardiologist read patients' electrocardiograms (ECGs). All ECGs were recorded at the standard 25 mm/s and 10 mm/mV. The sum of T wave inversion or TWI (mV) in consecutive leads, including anterior leads (V1, V2, V3, and V4), inferior leads (II, III, aVF), and lateral leads (I, aVL, V5, and V6) were calculated to estimate the cut-off points used to differentiate ACS versus acute PE. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of T wave changes. The Youden index was used to calculate the optimum cut-offs for sensitivity and specificity. Results Of 151 patients with a mean age of 55.44±12.88 years, 74 were in the acute PE and 77 were in the ACS groups. The results showed that the TWI sum in anterior leads >1.2 mV (P<0.001), in lateral leads >0.9 mV (P<0.001), in anterior-to-inferior leads ratio >12 (P<0.001), and V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.