ArticleCureus2024
A Decade of Progress: Assessing Three Revascularization Strategies for Iliac Occlusive Disease Through a 580-Case, 10-Year-Experience Literature Comparison.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scratch & slide technique recanalization of long chronic iliac occlusion.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction
methodsA 10-year single-center retrospective analysis was conducted, examining 521 patients (580 interventions) from January 2009 to December 2018. Treatments included endovascular recanalization and stenting (endovascular treatment, EVT) (31.4%), hybrid surgical treatment (HST) (31.6%), and open surgical treatment (OST) (37.07%). The examined characteristics were primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, complications, and the degree of limb salvage.
resultsThe study assessed variables such as age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking status, chronic kidney disease, and anesthesiological risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade). Patency rates across the three methods were 92.4%, with thrombosis observed in 7.6% of cases. Assisted primary reconstructions, identified in the analysis, were few in number. Across the three revascularization strategies, a total of 41 interventions were undertaken to preserve the patency of the index reconstruction. In cases of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the probability of losing patency is higher and occurs earlier. OST showed the longest patency duration (471.7±71.5 days), and EVT demonstrated consistent primary patency. Complications were the highest in OST, including five perioperative mortalities. Survival analysis revealed significant differences in patency between treatment methods, with EVT and HST showing better outcomes compared to OST, particularly in patients with CLTI.
conclusionBy far, this is one of the largest studies done comparing all three revascularization strategies. Endovascular, surgical, and hybrid interventions should be considered complementary elements in the vascular surgeon's toolkit. However, in the presented study, endovascular and hybrid treatment appeared to produce better outcomes compared to open surgical treatment, especially in patients with CLTI. Keeping this in mind the surgeon should be able to provide a more optimal and personalized treatment for patients with chronic lower limb ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.