ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2024
Bayesian Landmark-based Shape Analysis of Tumor Pathology Images.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial transcriptomics profiling across tissue boundaries in the developing mouse brain.iScience · 2026Article
- Applications of discriminative and deep learning feature extraction methods for whole slide image analysis: A survey.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Review
- SAFARI: shape analysis for AI-segmented images.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical imaging is a form of technology that has revolutionized the medical field over the past decades. Digital pathology imaging, which captures histological details at the cellular level, is rapidly becoming a routine clinical procedure for cancer diagnosis support and treatment planning. Recent developments in deep-learning methods have facilitated tumor region segmentation from pathology images. The traditional shape descriptors that characterize tumor boundary roughness at the anatomical level are no longer suitable. New statistical approaches to model tumor shapes are in urgent need. In this paper, we consider the problem of modeling a tumor boundary as a closed polygonal chain. A Bayesian landmark-based shape analysis model is proposed. The model partitions the polygonal chain into mutually exclusive segments, accounting for boundary roughness. Our Bayesian inference framework provides uncertainty estimations on both the number and locations of landmarks, while outputting metrics that can be used to quantify boundary roughness. The performance of our model is comparable with that of a recently developed landmark detection model for planar elastic curves. In a case study of 143 consecutive patients with stage I to IV lung cancer, we demonstrated the heterogeneity of tumor boundary roughness derived from our model effectively predicted patient prognosis (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.