ArticleOphthalmology science
Censoring the Floor Effect in Long-Term Stargardt Disease Microperimetry Data Produces a Faster Rate of Decline.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesopic microperimetry in Stargardt disease: Application and reliability.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Trial
- Update on the Management of ABCA4 Retinopathy (Stargardt Disease).Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Anatomy- versus Sensitivity-Based Loci Preselection in Detecting USH2A-Retinopathy Microperimetric Progression.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate progression rate estimation in long-term Stargardt disease microperimetry data by accounting for floor effect. Design: Cohort study. Subjects: Thirty-seven subjects (23 females, 14 males) with biallelic ABCA4 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and more than >2 years of longitudinal microperimetry data. Methods: Cross-sectional and longitudinal microperimetry data (Grid A: 18° diameter, Grid B: 6° diameter; Macular Integrity Assessment microperimeter, dynamic range 0-36 decibels [dB]) was extracted from patients with biallelic mutation in the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily A member 4 ( Main Outcome Measures: Microperimetry grid parameters at baseline and progression rates. Results: A total of 37 subjects with biallelic Conclusions: Incorporation of FCS can reduce confound of floor effect in perimetry analysis and can in turn detect a faster rate of decline. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.