Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280348›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Prediction of Functional and Anatomic Progression in Lamellar Macular Holes.

Emanuele Crincoli, Barbara Parolini, Fiammetta Catania, Alfonso Savastano, Maria Cristina Savastano, Clara Rizzo, Raphael Kilian, Veronika Matello, Davide Allegrini, Mario R Romano and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emanuele CrincoliOphthalmology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Barbara ParoliniEyecare Clinic, Crystal Palace, Brescia, Italy.
Fiammetta CataniaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Alfonso SavastanoOphthalmology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maria Cristina SavastanoOphthalmology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Clara RizzoOphthalmology, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Raphael KilianOphthalmology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Veronika MatelloEyecare Clinic, Crystal Palace, Brescia, Italy.
Davide AllegriniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Mario R RomanoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Stanislao RizzoOphthalmology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To use artificial intelligence to identify imaging biomarkers for anatomic and functional progression of lamellar macular hole (LMH) and elaborate a deep learning (DL) model based on OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA) for prediction of visual acuity (VA) loss in untreated LMHs. Design: Multicentric retrospective observational study. Participants: Patients aged >18 years diagnosed with idiopathic LMHs with availability of good quality OCT and OCTA acquisitions at baseline and a follow-up >2 years were recruited. Methods: A DL model based on soft voting of 2 separate models (OCT and OCTA-based respectively) was trained for identification of cases with VA loss >5 ETDRS letters (attributable to LMH progression only) during a 2-year follow-up. Biomarkers of anatomic and functional progression of LMH were evaluated with regression analysis, feature learning (support vector machine [SVM] model), and visualization maps. Main Outcome Measures: Ellipsoid zone (EZ) damage, volumetric tissue loss (TL), vitreopapillary adhesion (VPA), epiretinal proliferation, central macular thickness (CMT), parafoveal vessel density (VD) and vessel length density (VLD) of retinal capillary plexuses, choriocapillaris (CC), and flow deficit density (FDD). Results: Functionally progressing LMHs (VA-PROG group, 41/139 eyes [29.5%]) showed higher prevalence of EZ damage, higher volumetric TL, higher prevalence of VPA, lower superficial capillary plexus (SCP), VD and VLD, and higher CC FDD compared with functionally stable LMHs (VA-STABLE group, 98/139 eyes [70.5%]). The DL and SVM models showed 92.5% and 90.5% accuracy, respectively. The best-performing features in the SVM were EZ damage, TL, CC FDD, and parafoveal SCP VD. Epiretinal proliferation and lower CMT were risk factors for anatomic progression only. Conclusions: Deep learning can accurately predict functional progression of untreated LMHs over 2 years. The use of AI might improve our understanding of the natural course of retinal diseases. The integrity of CC and SCP might play an important role in the progression of LMHs. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDeep learningLamellar macular holeOCT angiographyProgression

Identifiers

PMID39280348
PMCPMC11401036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.