ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Design and evaluation of a wedge-shaped adaptive knee orthosis for the human lower limbs.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Fully Self-Powered Digital Wearable System for the Auxiliary Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is moderately correlated with age and body weight and increases with life span and weight gain, associated with tearing and wearing the knee joints. KOA can adjust the force through the human lower limbs, redistribute the load of the knee joint, reduce the pain, and restore mobility when the arthritis changes are mild. However, most of the existing knee orthosis cannot be adjusted adaptively according to the needs of patients. Methodology: This study establishes a biomechanical model of the knee joint to analyze the medial and lateral forces acting on the joint. The new adjustable knee orthosis is designed. It applies the principle of four-point bending to apply pressure to both sides of the knee joint, thereby adjusting the varus angle and modifying the medial and lateral forces on the knee joint. Through structural optimization, the prototype of the knee orthosis weighs only 324 g. Utilizing three-dimensional scanning technology, discrete point cloud data of the leg surface is obtained, reconstructed, and processed to create a 3D model of the human leg surface. The design ensures a close fit to the human leg surface, offering comfortable wear. A pressure sensing film system is employed to build a pressure sensing test system, where the knee orthosis is worn on a prosthesis for pressure testing to evaluate its ability to adjust knee joint forces. Results: The pressure test results demonstrate that the knee orthosis can stably provide an adjustment angle of 0-7° and sustain a maximum force of 10N on both sides of the knee joint over extended periods. A self-developed 8-channel plantar pressure sensing insole is calibrated against commercial plantar pressure sensors. Human wear tests on 15 subjects show that during the operation of the knee orthosis, it significantly adjusts plantar pressures, reducing lateral foot pressures by 22% overall, with more pronounced corrective effects observed in lighter participants. Discussion: In this study, a wedge-shaped adaptive knee orthosis was provided for KOA patients. The four-point force principle was used to balance the force between femurs and tibia and adjust the meniscus contact gap. The orthotic appliance has the advantages of simple mechanical structure, adjustable correction Angle and good wearing comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.