ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2024
Competency of Nurses on Electrocardiogram Monitoring and Interpretation in Selected Hospitals of Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The ability of healthcare nurses to monitor and interpret electrocardiograms (ECGs) is essential for the identification of heart-related abnormalities and rapid treatment initiation. Lack of expertise of nurses in this competency may cause confusion and complications. The aims of this study were to assess the competency levels of nurses in monitoring and interpreting ECGs and to associate the knowledge with the demographic variables. Patients and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. A total of 156 nurses were selected from five hospitals located in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia by computer generated simple randomization. A structured self-administered tool for knowledge and observational checklist for skills regarding ECG monitoring and interpretation was used. Tool validity and reliability were tested. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including the mean, standard deviation, and chi-square test, were applied. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Mean participant age was 32.59 ± 5.35 years, 30% of nurses had adequate knowledge, and the overall mean score was 17 ± 3.97. Seventy-two (46.2%) nurses correctly interpreted the ECG axis, and 76 (48.7%) could identify the Q-T interval on ECG strips. Significant associations of nurse knowledge level were detected with age (p < 0.0208), education (p < 0.0001), experience (p < 0.0001), nationality (p < 0.0002), and hospital type (p < 0.0018). Conclusion: Most nurses had a low level of expertise in interpreting ECGs, and it will be crucial for them to improve their competence. Adequate training on ECG interpretation will enhance the proficiency of nurses and help provide appropriate care and life-saving measures to patients in emergency situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.