Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280242›Full record

ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2024

Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.

Shayan Smani, Vinaik Sundaresan, Soum D Lokeshwar, Ankur U Choksi, Jeffrey Carbonella, Joseph Brito, Joseph Renzulli, Preston Sprenkle, Michael S Leapman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shayan SmaniYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3456-2023
Vinaik SundaresanYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Soum D LokeshwarDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Ankur U ChoksiDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Jeffrey CarbonellaDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Joseph BritoDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Joseph RenzulliDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Preston SprenkleDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-9294
Michael S LeapmanDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

Funding

NIA Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35AG049685 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Terri R. Fried · 2016 to 2026
$804k
NIA NIH HHS T35 AG049685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of prostate cancer Gleason grade group remains an important component of the initial management of clinically localized disease. However, Gleason score upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy can occur in up to a third of patients treated with surgery. Concern for disease undergrading remains a source of diagnostic uncertainty, contributing to both over-treatment of low-risk disease as well as under-treatment of higher-risk prostate cancer. This review examines the published literature concerning risk factors for GSU from time of biopsy to prostatectomy final pathology. Risk factors identified for Gleason upgrading include patient demographic and clinical factors including age, body mass index, race, prostate volume, and biomarker based assays, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and testosterone values. In addition, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have also been associated with GSU. Biopsy-specific characteristics associated with GSU include lower number of biopsy cores and lack of targeted methodology, and possibly increasing percent biopsy core positivity. Recognition of risk factors for disease undergrading may prompt confirmatory testing including repeat sampling or imaging. Continued refinements in imaging guided biopsy techniques may also reduce sampling error contributing to undergrading.

Indexed as

concordanceGleason score upgradingmagnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsyProstate cancerprostate-specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID39280242
PMCPMC11390291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.